The use of ultrasound in comparison to radiography in magnetically controlled growth rod lengthening measurement: a prospective study.

The use of ultrasound in comparison to radiography in magnetically controlled growth rod lengthening measurement: a prospective study. 2015-06-18T16:23:20+00:00

Eur Spine J. 2014 Sep 26. [Epub ahead of print]

Yoon WW, Chang AC, Tyler P, Butt S, Raniga S, Noordeen H.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

This study investigated whether ultrasound (U/S) is an alternative to radiography when measuring magnetically controlled growth rod (MCGR) length in order to reduce radiation exposure. Distractible spinal growth rods are the gold standard when treating early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

METHODS:

This was a prospective series. Patients were already undergoing EOS treatment using MCGRs. Forty- eight data points measured using radiography and U/S were compared. Each U/S data point was measured three times by three observers to assess intra- and inter-observer reliability. The radiation dose of the pre-lengthening and post-lengthening radiographs was recorded.

RESULTS:

The average rod lengths were 1.322 cm with U/S and 1.329 cm with radiography. The ICC (radiography vs. U/S) was 0.992 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.976, 1.000). The inter- and intra-rater reliability of U/S had an ICC of 0.987 (95 % CI 0.966, 1.000) and 0.983 (95 % CI 0.956, 1.000), respectively. The mean total effective radiation dose of the pre-lengthening and post-lengthening PA spinal radiographs was 0.26 mSv with a mean attributable lifetime cancer risk of one in 39,686 per lengthening.

CONCLUSION:

U/S highly agrees with radiography when measuring MCGR length. It has a high inter- and intra-observer reliability and does not require radiation exposure. Although U/S allows accurate MCGR measurement and soft tissue assessment, patients will still need occasional radiographs to assess spine bony elements, overall spinal balance and scoliosis correction. Combining radiography and U/S allows patient monitoring and accurate MCGR measurement whilst decreasing patients’ radiation exposure.

PMID: 25256680 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25256680


The materials on this website are for your general educational information only. Information you read on this website cannot replace the relationship that you have with your healthcare professional. We do not practice medicine or provide medical services or advice as a part of this website. You should always talk to your healthcare professional for diagnosis and treatment.